The result was keep. Prodego talk 23:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC) reply
See first nomination.
Redirect to
The God Delusion. POV fork deleted and redirected 4 months ago. One tenacious editor determined to challenge this.
Sophia 22:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
reply
Comment Sophia and Snalwimba are nowwere editing the article to make it worse to support their deletion arguments(!) to remove half the refed material. Please bear this in mind, and check that you are looking at a version from a proponent of the article with the 8 notable commentators (see below), before you vote.
NBeale 22:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC) (amended by
NBeale 23:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)and then by
NBeale 16:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC))
reply
*Keep as this sets a new standard for other articles for the improbability-of-ultimate-being (of which this allusion is just one of that class). Previously it was hard to have such recently invented neologisms get traction in Wikipedia even when other "notable" people had referenced the neologism. So I'm happy that this sticks.
Ttiotsw 10:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Prodego talk 23:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC) reply
See first nomination.
Redirect to
The God Delusion. POV fork deleted and redirected 4 months ago. One tenacious editor determined to challenge this.
Sophia 22:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
reply
Comment Sophia and Snalwimba are nowwere editing the article to make it worse to support their deletion arguments(!) to remove half the refed material. Please bear this in mind, and check that you are looking at a version from a proponent of the article with the 8 notable commentators (see below), before you vote.
NBeale 22:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC) (amended by
NBeale 23:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)and then by
NBeale 16:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC))
reply
*Keep as this sets a new standard for other articles for the improbability-of-ultimate-being (of which this allusion is just one of that class). Previously it was hard to have such recently invented neologisms get traction in Wikipedia even when other "notable" people had referenced the neologism. So I'm happy that this sticks.
Ttiotsw 10:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
reply