This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2008 June 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete per lack of notability and reliable sources as indicated below. The flood of anonymous/SPA accounts should also be reminded that deletion discussions are not a vote but rather a way of measuring policy-based consensus amount editors. -- jonny- m t 07:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Software that is not notable and has no reliable sources other then it’s home page, a rant page about someone who got fired from their job and another site that you need a password to get into. Pmedema ( talk) 12:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply
I say: just put the word Ulteo on google and you'll find over 250.000 pages of results! Only uncorrect people can say there are "No reliable, verifiable independent sources."
http://fosswire.com/2008/03/28/ulteo-application-system-beta-1-the-fosswire-review/ http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ulteo http://www.linux.com/feature/125891 http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/97110/index.html http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9832336-7.html http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071216-hands-on-with-the-new-online-version-of-openoffice-org.html http://lifehacker.com/software/online-documents/use-openoffice-online-with-ulteo-332841.php http://rangle.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/ulteo-will-it-change-the-way-we-all-use-computers/ http://wddc.blogspot.com/2007/12/would-ulteo-help-openoffice-to-beat-ms.html ... I think there's no need to go futher.
Before to say that "Is neither popular nor innovative" is better read about the Application System ( http://www.ulteo.com/home/applicationsystem) or the Online Desktop ( http://www.ulteo.com/home/onlinedesktop).
You want to know what to do with the Online Desktop? you may consider to read ( http://blog.ulteo.com/)
One thing is right: the page is not well done and MUST be edited. But I'm not so sure it must be deleted... -- Panta 21:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.20.72 ( talk • contribs) — 82.51.20.72 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. DarkAudit ( talk) 20:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2008 June 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete per lack of notability and reliable sources as indicated below. The flood of anonymous/SPA accounts should also be reminded that deletion discussions are not a vote but rather a way of measuring policy-based consensus amount editors. -- jonny- m t 07:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Software that is not notable and has no reliable sources other then it’s home page, a rant page about someone who got fired from their job and another site that you need a password to get into. Pmedema ( talk) 12:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC) reply
I say: just put the word Ulteo on google and you'll find over 250.000 pages of results! Only uncorrect people can say there are "No reliable, verifiable independent sources."
http://fosswire.com/2008/03/28/ulteo-application-system-beta-1-the-fosswire-review/ http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ulteo http://www.linux.com/feature/125891 http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/97110/index.html http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9832336-7.html http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071216-hands-on-with-the-new-online-version-of-openoffice-org.html http://lifehacker.com/software/online-documents/use-openoffice-online-with-ulteo-332841.php http://rangle.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/ulteo-will-it-change-the-way-we-all-use-computers/ http://wddc.blogspot.com/2007/12/would-ulteo-help-openoffice-to-beat-ms.html ... I think there's no need to go futher.
Before to say that "Is neither popular nor innovative" is better read about the Application System ( http://www.ulteo.com/home/applicationsystem) or the Online Desktop ( http://www.ulteo.com/home/onlinedesktop).
You want to know what to do with the Online Desktop? you may consider to read ( http://blog.ulteo.com/)
One thing is right: the page is not well done and MUST be edited. But I'm not so sure it must be deleted... -- Panta 21:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.20.72 ( talk • contribs) — 82.51.20.72 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. DarkAudit ( talk) 20:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply