- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Scott ( talk) 21:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ukkovaara ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination as prodded twice. Both are quoted below:
This page is very short, and, given that the height of the peak is 103m, does not appear to be particularly notable.
— User:Joemalt1832 14:20, 23 June 2012
Second-highest peak in Raahe sounds impressive until you realize that Raahe is a small town and it's a 103m HILL, which is a lot less impressive on the face of things. Per WP:GEOLAND, named natural features are notable if people have actually written about them aside from just statistical info, which is not the case for this tiny wee hill. Nowhere suitable for a redirect.
— User:Premeditated Chaos 14:27, 29 December 2018
Both users gave good explanations for their positions, and the former was contested without explanation or improvement. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment, Raahe is a municipality as well as a town, Ukkovaara is about 15km out of town, havent found anything out in gsearchland, unfortunately the Raahe article appears to concentrate on the town, otherwise, a redirect to a (presently non-existent) "Geography" section might be appropriate. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, as the second PROD-tagger. I don't think there's much point to adding a whole geography section in the Raahe article just to include the existence of a 103m-tall hill, especially given the absence of sources about the hill to verify anything we decide to merge. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find anything notable about this hill from Finnish-language sources. -- Pudeo ( talk) 22:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Scott ( talk) 21:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ukkovaara ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination as prodded twice. Both are quoted below:
This page is very short, and, given that the height of the peak is 103m, does not appear to be particularly notable.
— User:Joemalt1832 14:20, 23 June 2012
Second-highest peak in Raahe sounds impressive until you realize that Raahe is a small town and it's a 103m HILL, which is a lot less impressive on the face of things. Per WP:GEOLAND, named natural features are notable if people have actually written about them aside from just statistical info, which is not the case for this tiny wee hill. Nowhere suitable for a redirect.
— User:Premeditated Chaos 14:27, 29 December 2018
Both users gave good explanations for their positions, and the former was contested without explanation or improvement. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment, Raahe is a municipality as well as a town, Ukkovaara is about 15km out of town, havent found anything out in gsearchland, unfortunately the Raahe article appears to concentrate on the town, otherwise, a redirect to a (presently non-existent) "Geography" section might be appropriate. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, as the second PROD-tagger. I don't think there's much point to adding a whole geography section in the Raahe article just to include the existence of a 103m-tall hill, especially given the absence of sources about the hill to verify anything we decide to merge. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find anything notable about this hill from Finnish-language sources. -- Pudeo ( talk) 22:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.