From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of creatures in Meitei folklore. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Uchek Langmeidong (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

As left at article talk page: Reviewed under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process

Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.

In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability (there are no applicable SNG's for fictional characters) The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. Of the three references given, at two there is no relevant material at all, and the third appears to be a story itself from folklore that contains this character. And without coverage, there is no sourcable material for a full article. I will be nominating the article for deletion so that the community may decide. I believe that the two sentences which this article consists of would be good to have somewhere in Wikipedia. Probably the best place is in the Manipuri mythology article which in Wikipedia terms means "Merge to Manipuri mythology. If a close on the AFD is headed towards this, and somebody pings me I'd be happy to copy/move that material. I also note that this article has previously been deleted. North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of creatures in Meitei folklore. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Uchek Langmeidong (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

As left at article talk page: Reviewed under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process

Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.

In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability (there are no applicable SNG's for fictional characters) The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. Of the three references given, at two there is no relevant material at all, and the third appears to be a story itself from folklore that contains this character. And without coverage, there is no sourcable material for a full article. I will be nominating the article for deletion so that the community may decide. I believe that the two sentences which this article consists of would be good to have somewhere in Wikipedia. Probably the best place is in the Manipuri mythology article which in Wikipedia terms means "Merge to Manipuri mythology. If a close on the AFD is headed towards this, and somebody pings me I'd be happy to copy/move that material. I also note that this article has previously been deleted. North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook