- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
UK Rail Leasing
- UK Rail Leasing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Rail cruft - refs mainly point to Flickr/original research blog posts etc. Non notable company, only interested in rail related leasing. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Most of this is about what individual locomotives have done on various dates, and where they may be seen. Essentially, it's a trainspotter's log book, not encyclopedic. If the trainspotting is removed (see WP:NOTDIARY), there's very little left. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 09:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as indiscriminate collection of information and not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
UK Rail Leasing
- UK Rail Leasing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Rail cruft - refs mainly point to Flickr/original research blog posts etc. Non notable company, only interested in rail related leasing. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 07:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Most of this is about what individual locomotives have done on various dates, and where they may be seen. Essentially, it's a trainspotter's log book, not encyclopedic. If the trainspotting is removed (see WP:NOTDIARY), there's very little left. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 09:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as indiscriminate collection of information and not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.