- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- UFO-Norge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has no in-line sources, and an internet search failed to find any independent, reliable, secondary sources. Even the unreliable sources that mention this organization do so in passing, and are dated. There is an extant website, but it is largely devoid of content. Although information is provided on that site for a (paid) subscription to its alleged journal ("Tidsskriftet"), there are no links to said journal's content, and no such references to it could be found in any secondary RS. Even the website's "media" tab is empty. Notability of this organization is thus suspect.
Note that this article was originally proposed for deletion in 2008. That AfD had few participants, a consensus of Keep, and included false claims that "reliable sources" exist and had been added to the article. The editor who made those claims, User: Kristen Eriksen, has been blocked indefinitely since 2009 and the closer of that AfD, User:John254, is not only the sockmaster of User:Kristen Eriksen, but was also banned from enWiki in 2009. The dubious original AfD and the complete lack of sources in the article, then and now, speak for itself. JoJo Anthrax ( talk) 01:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 01:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 01:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It is a pitiful blog. - Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 10:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not only because it fails the second criterion in WP:CLUB, but also because it doesn't exist any more, having merged with an even less prominent organisation called NETI to form the Norsk UFOSenter (which has no article). There is thus even less reason to retain this. asnac ( talk) 12:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per above points. Light2021 ( talk) 22:49, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- UFO-Norge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has no in-line sources, and an internet search failed to find any independent, reliable, secondary sources. Even the unreliable sources that mention this organization do so in passing, and are dated. There is an extant website, but it is largely devoid of content. Although information is provided on that site for a (paid) subscription to its alleged journal ("Tidsskriftet"), there are no links to said journal's content, and no such references to it could be found in any secondary RS. Even the website's "media" tab is empty. Notability of this organization is thus suspect.
Note that this article was originally proposed for deletion in 2008. That AfD had few participants, a consensus of Keep, and included false claims that "reliable sources" exist and had been added to the article. The editor who made those claims, User: Kristen Eriksen, has been blocked indefinitely since 2009 and the closer of that AfD, User:John254, is not only the sockmaster of User:Kristen Eriksen, but was also banned from enWiki in 2009. The dubious original AfD and the complete lack of sources in the article, then and now, speak for itself. JoJo Anthrax ( talk) 01:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 01:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 01:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It is a pitiful blog. - Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 10:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not only because it fails the second criterion in WP:CLUB, but also because it doesn't exist any more, having merged with an even less prominent organisation called NETI to form the Norsk UFOSenter (which has no article). There is thus even less reason to retain this. asnac ( talk) 12:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per above points. Light2021 ( talk) 22:49, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.