The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (soliloquize) @ 10:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

UE 900

UE 900 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner  talk 17:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Dmatteng ( talk) 13:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Merge/redirect to Ultimate Ears While there is coverage on this product, Wikipedia is not a product guide, and that's all this article is. WP:PRODUCT at least advises this outcome. —/ Mendaliv/ ^2¢/ _Δ's/ 17:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Per WP:PRODUCT the product might have its own entry as it demonstrated sufficient notability on its own. The article was submitted to an independent experienced editor in order to be reviewed and ensure that it complies with the WP guidelines prior to posting to the main space. Dmatteng ( talk) 18:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment This AfD is similar to AfD that was just closed as keep. Multiple reviews satisfies GNG. Dmatteng ( talk) 18:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC) reply
    • Every article is judged on its own merits, so comparing with other articles/AfD's is useless. The Banner  talk 19:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC) reply
      • Sorry, I cannot reply to the nominator as per Dennis Brown we have to avoid each other. However, it was noted that he nominated 3 of my articles to AfD and the community voted to keep two of them, with this one pending. Dmatteng ( talk) 20:12, 4 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep Honestly now, look at that large Reception section! The product has been reviewed by a slew of reliable sources. It doesn't look like an advertisement to me. Dream Focus 19:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep Any corporation or product can be framed as "advertising" but one needs to make a case for it by explaining why the sources used in this article are non-neutral. Keep per WP:GNG. -- Green C 20:15, 10 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Notable product. If there's a promotional issue, fix it or tag it, don't delete it. ~ KvnG 22:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.