From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply

U5cms

U5cms (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Queried speedy delete as advertisement. Page U5cms has been speedy-deleted and restarted twice, the second time with this message to me: "Dear Anthony Appleyard, you have deleted the article u5cms. According to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:CSD#G11 this was not promotional: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The u5cms article (about a Content Management System) is the same style and category as many others in Wikipedia, e.g. /info/en/?search=TangoCMS. The page /info/en/?search=List_of_content_management_systems gives an overview concerning these systems with Links to the respective Wikipedia-Articles. The subject "CMS" is present in Wikipedia and for a encyclopaedia it is important to be complete. If you think the u5cms article does not meet the standards, please let me know how to make it better (please do not delete it). 11:14, 2 August 2014‎ User:Stemind". Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 11:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Use at one university does not equate with notability even under the essay WP:NSOFT. -- Bejnar ( talk) 15:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply
No it does not. it is just another University of Bern citation, see above, from an SPA account. -- Bejnar ( talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply

U5cms

U5cms (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Queried speedy delete as advertisement. Page U5cms has been speedy-deleted and restarted twice, the second time with this message to me: "Dear Anthony Appleyard, you have deleted the article u5cms. According to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:CSD#G11 this was not promotional: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The u5cms article (about a Content Management System) is the same style and category as many others in Wikipedia, e.g. /info/en/?search=TangoCMS. The page /info/en/?search=List_of_content_management_systems gives an overview concerning these systems with Links to the respective Wikipedia-Articles. The subject "CMS" is present in Wikipedia and for a encyclopaedia it is important to be complete. If you think the u5cms article does not meet the standards, please let me know how to make it better (please do not delete it). 11:14, 2 August 2014‎ User:Stemind". Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 11:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Use at one university does not equate with notability even under the essay WP:NSOFT. -- Bejnar ( talk) 15:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply
No it does not. it is just another University of Bern citation, see above, from an SPA account. -- Bejnar ( talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook