The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Queried speedy delete as advertisement. Page
U5cms has been speedy-deleted and restarted twice, the second time with this message to me: "Dear Anthony Appleyard, you have deleted the article u5cms. According to
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:CSD#G11 this was not promotional: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The u5cms article (about a Content Management System) is the same style and category as many others in Wikipedia, e.g.
/info/en/?search=TangoCMS. The page
/info/en/?search=List_of_content_management_systems gives an overview concerning these systems with Links to the respective Wikipedia-Articles. The subject "CMS" is present in Wikipedia and for a encyclopaedia it is important to be complete. If you think the u5cms article does not meet the standards, please let me know how to make it better (please do not delete it). 11:14, 2 August 2014
User:Stemind".
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 11:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete this free software has not received significant coverage in independent
reliable sources. That does not mean that it is not important, but it does mean that it fails Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It fails the
general notability guidelines. See also the essay
Wikipedia:Notability (software). The author has chosen only related sites as references. I have found mentions in blogs but nothing that constitutes an independent
reliable source. --
Bejnar (
talk) 05:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Use at one university does not equate with notability even under the essayWP:NSOFT. --
Bejnar (
talk) 15:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: lacks significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track) 19:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)reply
May be do not delete: Hello, here a comment from the authors of the u5CMS. May be this page helps for your decission:
http://studmed.unibe.ch/a-z/page.php?id=u5cms it is in german but translates well with google. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ufive (
talk •
contribs) 07:02, 8 August 2014 (UTC)reply
No it does not. it is just another University of Bern citation, see above, from an
SPA account. --
Bejnar (
talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Queried speedy delete as advertisement. Page
U5cms has been speedy-deleted and restarted twice, the second time with this message to me: "Dear Anthony Appleyard, you have deleted the article u5cms. According to
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:CSD#G11 this was not promotional: "Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The u5cms article (about a Content Management System) is the same style and category as many others in Wikipedia, e.g.
/info/en/?search=TangoCMS. The page
/info/en/?search=List_of_content_management_systems gives an overview concerning these systems with Links to the respective Wikipedia-Articles. The subject "CMS" is present in Wikipedia and for a encyclopaedia it is important to be complete. If you think the u5cms article does not meet the standards, please let me know how to make it better (please do not delete it). 11:14, 2 August 2014
User:Stemind".
Anthony Appleyard (
talk) 11:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete this free software has not received significant coverage in independent
reliable sources. That does not mean that it is not important, but it does mean that it fails Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It fails the
general notability guidelines. See also the essay
Wikipedia:Notability (software). The author has chosen only related sites as references. I have found mentions in blogs but nothing that constitutes an independent
reliable source. --
Bejnar (
talk) 05:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Use at one university does not equate with notability even under the essayWP:NSOFT. --
Bejnar (
talk) 15:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: lacks significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track) 19:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)reply
May be do not delete: Hello, here a comment from the authors of the u5CMS. May be this page helps for your decission:
http://studmed.unibe.ch/a-z/page.php?id=u5cms it is in german but translates well with google. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ufive (
talk •
contribs) 07:02, 8 August 2014 (UTC)reply
No it does not. it is just another University of Bern citation, see above, from an
SPA account. --
Bejnar (
talk) 14:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.