From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Type 4/5 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly GF article, on a fake topic. An invented claim for a WWII Japanese super-heavy tank, sourced to those unimpeachable paragons Reddit and World of Tanks.

As a technical concept, this makes no sense either. Japan didn't keep the major wartime projects, like Unit 731, secret long-term. It bears no commonality to Japanese tank design. The design is, if anything, a kid's doodle from reading too much about the German Maus. Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

At best, it could be something lifted from a Japanese engineer's notes but one among many paper sketches on which nothing actually progressed. Certainly in absence of any reliable source it ought to head to the bin. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
It's World of Tanks alternate universe fiction, based on the one ref. Can we Speedy this under G3, as it's fiction being presented as fact? Jergling ( talk) 20:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 21:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 21:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Type 4/5 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly GF article, on a fake topic. An invented claim for a WWII Japanese super-heavy tank, sourced to those unimpeachable paragons Reddit and World of Tanks.

As a technical concept, this makes no sense either. Japan didn't keep the major wartime projects, like Unit 731, secret long-term. It bears no commonality to Japanese tank design. The design is, if anything, a kid's doodle from reading too much about the German Maus. Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

At best, it could be something lifted from a Japanese engineer's notes but one among many paper sketches on which nothing actually progressed. Certainly in absence of any reliable source it ought to head to the bin. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
It's World of Tanks alternate universe fiction, based on the one ref. Can we Speedy this under G3, as it's fiction being presented as fact? Jergling ( talk) 20:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 21:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 21:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook