From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 11:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Tyee City, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded, and then deprodded with "passes WP:GEOLAND". In my opinion it does not, since it's only a couple of farms outside of McKinleyville, California and not properly verified as being a settlement. Geschichte ( talk) 16:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete WP:GEOLAND requires that a place either be "officially recognized" or meet GNG; this one is neither. There are a few mentions in 20th century newspapers but not sufficient to meet GNG. – dlthewave 18:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - I'm the guilty party who removed so many small-town-California prods yesterday (10 actually). Anyway...the nominator of this AfD mentioned there appears to be "a couple of farms", and it got me wondering...how many farms make a community? One? Probably not (bye bye Monowi, Nebraska!). Two? Maybe. indeed, I also see on Google Maps those "couple of farms", so maybe this is a populated place? GNIS (an "offical source") calls it a "populated place", and the criteria listed at WP:GEOLAND basically say it needs to be populated place to be notable. It's all good then?
The Mad River Union in nearby Arcata, California writes often of Tyee City:
    • Lol "micro-community". Don't misrepresent GEOLAND, which says it needs to be a legally recognized populated place to be notable (yes, incorporation as a legal municipality like Monowi counts!). Of course the breadth of this poorly drafted line has been debated, but you well know the GNIS's classifications are well-established to be crap and merely acknowledge it has appeared on a map at some point. But being a "community" or neighborhood–be it a subdivision or nearby farms–is not automatic notability. In this case there does appear to be enough coverage to satisfy GEOLAND#2. Reywas92 Talk 20:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 11:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Tyee City, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded, and then deprodded with "passes WP:GEOLAND". In my opinion it does not, since it's only a couple of farms outside of McKinleyville, California and not properly verified as being a settlement. Geschichte ( talk) 16:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete WP:GEOLAND requires that a place either be "officially recognized" or meet GNG; this one is neither. There are a few mentions in 20th century newspapers but not sufficient to meet GNG. – dlthewave 18:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - I'm the guilty party who removed so many small-town-California prods yesterday (10 actually). Anyway...the nominator of this AfD mentioned there appears to be "a couple of farms", and it got me wondering...how many farms make a community? One? Probably not (bye bye Monowi, Nebraska!). Two? Maybe. indeed, I also see on Google Maps those "couple of farms", so maybe this is a populated place? GNIS (an "offical source") calls it a "populated place", and the criteria listed at WP:GEOLAND basically say it needs to be populated place to be notable. It's all good then?
The Mad River Union in nearby Arcata, California writes often of Tyee City:
    • Lol "micro-community". Don't misrepresent GEOLAND, which says it needs to be a legally recognized populated place to be notable (yes, incorporation as a legal municipality like Monowi counts!). Of course the breadth of this poorly drafted line has been debated, but you well know the GNIS's classifications are well-established to be crap and merely acknowledge it has appeared on a map at some point. But being a "community" or neighborhood–be it a subdivision or nearby farms–is not automatic notability. In this case there does appear to be enough coverage to satisfy GEOLAND#2. Reywas92 Talk 20:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook