- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
TwentyThirtyThree
- TwentyThirtyThree ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP:PROD with the reason "Non-notable." Euryalus ( talk) 11:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 15:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like an A9 case to me... Peridon ( talk) 16:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - NN. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 17:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree with Peridon it seems to meet WP:A9 criteria, so clear candidate for deletion.-- Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 19:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable, band article already deleted. Snappy ( talk) 17:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: It fails notability, the bands article is already deleted. Murry1975 ( talk) 20:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
TwentyThirtyThree
- TwentyThirtyThree ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP:PROD with the reason "Non-notable." Euryalus ( talk) 11:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 15:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like an A9 case to me... Peridon ( talk) 16:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - NN. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 17:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree with Peridon it seems to meet WP:A9 criteria, so clear candidate for deletion.-- Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 19:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable, band article already deleted. Snappy ( talk) 17:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: It fails notability, the bands article is already deleted. Murry1975 ( talk) 20:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.