The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't appear to be notable, all the sources are churnalism/gossipy cruft and a search under his arabic name gives only 8 hits, none of which are particularly useful to establish notability. This was also previously deleted as
Telfaz11 and it appears that someone has engaged in PR shopping to get his name out there.
Praxidicae (
talk)
19:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable! I don't found any reliable sources about him on Arabic Language, also as Ref. NO.6 (in Arabic) not mean anything, all results about him related to his accounts on the social media.
His article on arwiki translated from this enwiki version before few days (8 Jan. 2020) in competition about Saudi Arabia in arwiki. Now I deleted arwiki article as under non-notability reason --Alaa:)..!19:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Vexations I think perhaps once we get the reports done (
see here for what I've started) we should make a thread...somewhere and perhaps get a CU involved because I suspect this is going to have a plethora of various UPE editing groups and then yeah, I'd say g11/g5 the lot where no other sources exist and the rest we AFD.
Praxidicae (
talk)
20:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete with thanks to Praxidicae for starting the AfD – I was going to, but had to leave my computer for a bit. As curious as I am about
the place that is known for circumstances, it is very clear that none of the sources is any good. Also clear COI/UPE editing (none of the sources mentions a birthdate, yet the article creator somehow knew it...) --bonadeacontributionstalk23:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete; the non-fake news articles (
thesefour"news"articles) seem to all be paid promotions. They also reference his youtube channel's statistics to a major extent, which is not very indicative of a source that heralds some contributions towards
GNG given that his youtubing career isn't his main profession. J947(
c), at
01:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't appear to be notable, all the sources are churnalism/gossipy cruft and a search under his arabic name gives only 8 hits, none of which are particularly useful to establish notability. This was also previously deleted as
Telfaz11 and it appears that someone has engaged in PR shopping to get his name out there.
Praxidicae (
talk)
19:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable! I don't found any reliable sources about him on Arabic Language, also as Ref. NO.6 (in Arabic) not mean anything, all results about him related to his accounts on the social media.
His article on arwiki translated from this enwiki version before few days (8 Jan. 2020) in competition about Saudi Arabia in arwiki. Now I deleted arwiki article as under non-notability reason --Alaa:)..!19:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Vexations I think perhaps once we get the reports done (
see here for what I've started) we should make a thread...somewhere and perhaps get a CU involved because I suspect this is going to have a plethora of various UPE editing groups and then yeah, I'd say g11/g5 the lot where no other sources exist and the rest we AFD.
Praxidicae (
talk)
20:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete with thanks to Praxidicae for starting the AfD – I was going to, but had to leave my computer for a bit. As curious as I am about
the place that is known for circumstances, it is very clear that none of the sources is any good. Also clear COI/UPE editing (none of the sources mentions a birthdate, yet the article creator somehow knew it...) --bonadeacontributionstalk23:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete; the non-fake news articles (
thesefour"news"articles) seem to all be paid promotions. They also reference his youtube channel's statistics to a major extent, which is not very indicative of a source that heralds some contributions towards
GNG given that his youtubing career isn't his main profession. J947(
c), at
01:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.