The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. apparent consensus after relisting DGG (
talk ) 06:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment, hi
Rms125a@hotmail.com, so are you suggesting that the films von Molo were in are not notable or that her roles were not significant (point no. 1 of
WP:NACTOR)?
Coolabahapple (
talk) 06:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
@Coolabahapple : I am suggesting that the totality of her career (9 films between 1930 and 1933, per
IMDb) does not meet the notability threshold. You are, of course, free to disagree. Yours.
Quis separabit? 18:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
thanks for the clarification, cheers.
Coolabahapple (
talk) 08:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Not seeing why this is at AfD. Notable topic.
Unscintillating (
talk) 17:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Being a leading actress in multiple films is generally a very good clue to a person being notable. The films were not produced in English and are old, but neither of those are things that would affect notability. The article needs work, yes, but
AfD is not for cleanup. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 02:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep lead actress in multiple films, good coverage of the Mona Lisa film in the US. I imagine there are plenty of German sources if this kind of coverage was available in US.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 14:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. apparent consensus after relisting DGG (
talk ) 06:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment, hi
Rms125a@hotmail.com, so are you suggesting that the films von Molo were in are not notable or that her roles were not significant (point no. 1 of
WP:NACTOR)?
Coolabahapple (
talk) 06:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
@Coolabahapple : I am suggesting that the totality of her career (9 films between 1930 and 1933, per
IMDb) does not meet the notability threshold. You are, of course, free to disagree. Yours.
Quis separabit? 18:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
thanks for the clarification, cheers.
Coolabahapple (
talk) 08:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Not seeing why this is at AfD. Notable topic.
Unscintillating (
talk) 17:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Being a leading actress in multiple films is generally a very good clue to a person being notable. The films were not produced in English and are old, but neither of those are things that would affect notability. The article needs work, yes, but
AfD is not for cleanup. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 02:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep lead actress in multiple films, good coverage of the Mona Lisa film in the US. I imagine there are plenty of German sources if this kind of coverage was available in US.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 14:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.