From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) NorthAmerica 1000 08:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Trevor James Constable

Trevor James Constable (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in depth enough to pass WP:AUTHOR. There is literally only one paragraph in one book [1] that mentions Constable, and this is in relation to his musings on UFO creatures. LuckyLouie ( talk) 16:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete -- classic instance of failing WP:BIO. jps ( talk) 17:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete due to absence of reliable independent sources. Guy ( Help!) 19:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Keep or Move - I've added three sources in and removed the blatant copyvio that was taking up half the article before. He's in a few other books as well and seems to have had an impact on cryptozoology and the history of UFO-ology. The two objections I can see people raising are A: This is utterly insane - which is true, but so is the rest of this 'field', you've got to look at it as it is. B: One of your sources is Brad Steiger - I accept that he, too, is insane - but I defy you to find anybody else as knowledgeable about the history of the subject. If he were talking about theories as if they were true, I would agree. He seems to simply be recounting the supposed facts.
Also yes! It is the same guy! I think that adds to the notability whilst also adding to the batshit insanity. (The Brad Steiger book also talks about that, but does so in a non-neutral light so I didn't add it) Panyd The muffin is not subtle 19:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Added a section on the added insanity. Ripped $3.2 million off of the Malaysian government. With pipes to influence chi. $3.2 million. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 19:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The skeptic Ronald Story covers a page on the ideas of Constable and other similar writers [2] from The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial Encounters. Constable was also in a video documentary [3]. Not sure if it is reliable but also information on Constable in Far Out: 101 Strange Tales From Science's Outer Edge by the writer Mark Pilkington [4]. Another reliable source would be UFO Religion: Inside Flying Saucer Cults and Culture by Gregory Reece which mentions the ideas of Constable on one page [5] and dam it's a shame I don't have access to the book but I have just discovered that the science writer/skeptic Morris Goran has included a few pages in his book on debunking Constable's wacky ideas. The book is The Modern Myth: Ancient Astronauts and UFOs which was one of the first books to debunk Von Daniken. Goblin Face ( talk) 22:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately the 101 Strange Tales bit at least is a word-of-word copy of one of the sources already in there. Going to look at the others later, but that one is out. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 12:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Keep - per adding of reliable sources and removal of copyvio problems.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Keep, given the addition of reliable sources etc. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( Message me) 14:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) NorthAmerica 1000 08:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Trevor James Constable

Trevor James Constable (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in depth enough to pass WP:AUTHOR. There is literally only one paragraph in one book [1] that mentions Constable, and this is in relation to his musings on UFO creatures. LuckyLouie ( talk) 16:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete -- classic instance of failing WP:BIO. jps ( talk) 17:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete due to absence of reliable independent sources. Guy ( Help!) 19:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Keep or Move - I've added three sources in and removed the blatant copyvio that was taking up half the article before. He's in a few other books as well and seems to have had an impact on cryptozoology and the history of UFO-ology. The two objections I can see people raising are A: This is utterly insane - which is true, but so is the rest of this 'field', you've got to look at it as it is. B: One of your sources is Brad Steiger - I accept that he, too, is insane - but I defy you to find anybody else as knowledgeable about the history of the subject. If he were talking about theories as if they were true, I would agree. He seems to simply be recounting the supposed facts.
Also yes! It is the same guy! I think that adds to the notability whilst also adding to the batshit insanity. (The Brad Steiger book also talks about that, but does so in a non-neutral light so I didn't add it) Panyd The muffin is not subtle 19:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Added a section on the added insanity. Ripped $3.2 million off of the Malaysian government. With pipes to influence chi. $3.2 million. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 19:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The skeptic Ronald Story covers a page on the ideas of Constable and other similar writers [2] from The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial Encounters. Constable was also in a video documentary [3]. Not sure if it is reliable but also information on Constable in Far Out: 101 Strange Tales From Science's Outer Edge by the writer Mark Pilkington [4]. Another reliable source would be UFO Religion: Inside Flying Saucer Cults and Culture by Gregory Reece which mentions the ideas of Constable on one page [5] and dam it's a shame I don't have access to the book but I have just discovered that the science writer/skeptic Morris Goran has included a few pages in his book on debunking Constable's wacky ideas. The book is The Modern Myth: Ancient Astronauts and UFOs which was one of the first books to debunk Von Daniken. Goblin Face ( talk) 22:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately the 101 Strange Tales bit at least is a word-of-word copy of one of the sources already in there. Going to look at the others later, but that one is out. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 12:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Keep - per adding of reliable sources and removal of copyvio problems.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Keep, given the addition of reliable sources etc. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( Message me) 14:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook