The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC) reply
As always, the creator of this article (or anyone else) is welcome to show us that "[t]he book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself," which is the basic relevant standard for encyclopedic inclusion.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC) reply
As always, the creator of this article (or anyone else) is welcome to show us that "[t]he book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself," which is the basic relevant standard for encyclopedic inclusion.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply