The result was No consensus. Whilst there were a large number of opinions along the Merge and/or Redirect routes, many of these were added before the article was substantially improved and more importantly referenced, and as such it should at least be given more time. If, after allowing that further amount of time, there are still significant concerns about the article, then it can always be referred back here. BLACKKITE 00:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This neologism article has no sources/references or assertion of notability. It may be that it is notable, but its adherence to WP:N is not established and the article hasn't been edited since 6/07. Avruch Talk 00:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. Whilst there were a large number of opinions along the Merge and/or Redirect routes, many of these were added before the article was substantially improved and more importantly referenced, and as such it should at least be given more time. If, after allowing that further amount of time, there are still significant concerns about the article, then it can always be referred back here. BLACKKITE 00:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This neologism article has no sources/references or assertion of notability. It may be that it is notable, but its adherence to WP:N is not established and the article hasn't been edited since 6/07. Avruch Talk 00:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC) reply