- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Trans-Dublin
- Trans-Dublin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:OR . Can find no usage of this outside wiki Gnevin ( talk) 11:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 11:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 11:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom, the term "Trans-Dublin" doesn't seem to have any existence (and hence no coverage or RS) outside of Wikipedia. It would therefore seem to fail WP:GNG and WP:OR. Whatever content can be sourced could be readily merged to Dublin Suburban Rail or similar. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as Hoax
- Tagged as such - The whole system is called Dublin Area Rapid Transit- There is no "Trans Dublin" and this proves it. It's a clever hoax but still a hoax nonetheless. – Davey2010 Talk 13:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Also just to note DART themselves make no mention of this supposed name and yet they run services on it!. – Davey2010 Talk 13:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed. However, I'm not sure "blatant/deliberate hoax" is fair. Over the years I have seen other articles of this type which were (at best) OR and CRYSTAL in tone. Perhaps, I expect, prompted by green optimism. Though, perhaps, not by deliberate deception. Whatever the motivation, this should be deleted. IMO. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed in all fairness the article's been here since 2007 so maybe it's not deliberate, I wonder whether at the time of creation whether "Trans-Dublin" was a short lived unreported name .... Seems odd that there's a route map as well as it being listed in nav boxes .... If it was a hoax surely no one would've gone to those sort of lengths to hide it as a hoax ? .... Seems too much effort ?, Dunno but nothing on Google confirms this ever was a thing. – Davey2010 Talk 14:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Strong delete Original research. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 14:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Trans-Dublin
- Trans-Dublin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:OR . Can find no usage of this outside wiki Gnevin ( talk) 11:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 11:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 11:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom, the term "Trans-Dublin" doesn't seem to have any existence (and hence no coverage or RS) outside of Wikipedia. It would therefore seem to fail WP:GNG and WP:OR. Whatever content can be sourced could be readily merged to Dublin Suburban Rail or similar. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as Hoax
- Tagged as such - The whole system is called Dublin Area Rapid Transit- There is no "Trans Dublin" and this proves it. It's a clever hoax but still a hoax nonetheless. – Davey2010 Talk 13:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Also just to note DART themselves make no mention of this supposed name and yet they run services on it!. – Davey2010 Talk 13:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed. However, I'm not sure "blatant/deliberate hoax" is fair. Over the years I have seen other articles of this type which were (at best) OR and CRYSTAL in tone. Perhaps, I expect, prompted by green optimism. Though, perhaps, not by deliberate deception. Whatever the motivation, this should be deleted. IMO. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed in all fairness the article's been here since 2007 so maybe it's not deliberate, I wonder whether at the time of creation whether "Trans-Dublin" was a short lived unreported name .... Seems odd that there's a route map as well as it being listed in nav boxes .... If it was a hoax surely no one would've gone to those sort of lengths to hide it as a hoax ? .... Seems too much effort ?, Dunno but nothing on Google confirms this ever was a thing. – Davey2010 Talk 14:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Strong delete Original research. Optakeover (U) (T) (C) 14:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.