- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No consensus to merge and no dissent of the notion that there is nothing to merge So Why 11:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Towns in Mayo by population ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete: This article was started 5 years ago and has not been revised since. It is a very small extract, just the 5 largest County Mayo towns, from the full version List of census towns in the Republic of Ireland, where the County Mayo entry consists of 32 towns, so it makes no sense to have this incomplete list. I can't find any other counties that have such a "largest town census data" page and this one omits up to date data. The latest census date for these 5 towns already exists in the main County Mayo article and this could easily be added there if warranted. I cannot see any justifiable reason to keep this orphan as it serves no new or significant purpose and only duplicates information available more fully elsewhere. ww2censor ( talk) 11:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Merge, probably to County Mayo, per Ww2censor's nomination. If all the info in the article currently is already in the County Mayo article, or could be put there in the merge implementation, then no one should object. I am not sure this required an AFD; perhaps some bold editing to just implement the merge, or having a merge discussion at the Talk pages, would have sufficed instead. Since redirects are cheap, it does no harm to leave the redirect behind and avoid completely deleting someone's contribution. -- do ncr am 21:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; all the relevant information is in County Mayo. I don't think this is a plausible search term, and there's no content worth merging. Power~enwiki ( talk) 00:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 04:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 04:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No consensus to merge and no dissent of the notion that there is nothing to merge So Why 11:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Towns in Mayo by population ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete: This article was started 5 years ago and has not been revised since. It is a very small extract, just the 5 largest County Mayo towns, from the full version List of census towns in the Republic of Ireland, where the County Mayo entry consists of 32 towns, so it makes no sense to have this incomplete list. I can't find any other counties that have such a "largest town census data" page and this one omits up to date data. The latest census date for these 5 towns already exists in the main County Mayo article and this could easily be added there if warranted. I cannot see any justifiable reason to keep this orphan as it serves no new or significant purpose and only duplicates information available more fully elsewhere. ww2censor ( talk) 11:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Merge, probably to County Mayo, per Ww2censor's nomination. If all the info in the article currently is already in the County Mayo article, or could be put there in the merge implementation, then no one should object. I am not sure this required an AFD; perhaps some bold editing to just implement the merge, or having a merge discussion at the Talk pages, would have sufficed instead. Since redirects are cheap, it does no harm to leave the redirect behind and avoid completely deleting someone's contribution. -- do ncr am 21:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; all the relevant information is in County Mayo. I don't think this is a plausible search term, and there's no content worth merging. Power~enwiki ( talk) 00:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 04:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 04:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.