- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Touchsuite
The result was speedy delete. Advertising. (& not notable as well)
DGG (
talk ) 02:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- I have reverted my speedy close by request of the contributor, though I think it arguably justified. I will comment below.
- Touchsuite ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if this is notable, especially given that it doesn't seem to fully maintain NPOV, and some of it reads as an advert. | Naypta talk opened his mouth at 16:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete no credible claim to importance, and promotionalism. The firm is on the Inc 500 list of fastest growing companies, which normally indicates that is small and not yet notable. . This is therefore not a credible claim to importance. The emphasis on the inclusion in the list in the first paragraph was advertising. Otherwise, I see either just mentions or press releases-- except for the NYT article, which is I think a human interest story about the family, and does not show notability of the company. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As above, no claim of notability, clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 ( talk) 21:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. References do not adequately support notability, specifically WP:CORP. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:18, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Founder Sam Zietz is the subject of articles in Inc and the New York Times but he seems more notable than his company. Maybe he should be the subject of this article. I mean, he has executive producer credits on IMDb, he certainly seems notable on his own. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Touchsuite
The result was speedy delete. Advertising. (& not notable as well)
DGG (
talk ) 02:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- I have reverted my speedy close by request of the contributor, though I think it arguably justified. I will comment below.
- Touchsuite ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if this is notable, especially given that it doesn't seem to fully maintain NPOV, and some of it reads as an advert. | Naypta talk opened his mouth at 16:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete no credible claim to importance, and promotionalism. The firm is on the Inc 500 list of fastest growing companies, which normally indicates that is small and not yet notable. . This is therefore not a credible claim to importance. The emphasis on the inclusion in the list in the first paragraph was advertising. Otherwise, I see either just mentions or press releases-- except for the NYT article, which is I think a human interest story about the family, and does not show notability of the company. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As above, no claim of notability, clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 ( talk) 21:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. References do not adequately support notability, specifically WP:CORP. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:18, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Founder Sam Zietz is the subject of articles in Inc and the New York Times but he seems more notable than his company. Maybe he should be the subject of this article. I mean, he has executive producer credits on IMDb, he certainly seems notable on his own. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.