- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Lixil Group. Black Kite (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- Tostem ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NCORP. There is no coverage by third party reliable sources. For these reasons, I think that the article should be deleted. Please note that previously, this page was a redirect to Tostem Station, and I think that it could be re-created after deletion. Kostas20142 ( talk) 11:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lixil Group; a valid search term as per WP:ATD-R. North America 1000 02:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- A question to the nominator: when you say that there is no coverage by reliable third-party sources, I assume you checked potential sources in Japanese as well? If so, I agree with North America that "Lixil Group" is a better redirect target. If not, then someone needs to check Japanese sources before this is deleted (I do not speak Japanese, so unfortunately cannot help).— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); October 23, 2017; 14:17 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lixil Group as WP:ATD; no need for a separate article. No indications of notability or significance, and no sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- dab Lots of sources in WP:BEFORE such as sixth snippet on Google books which states, "The top five Japanese residential window companies in 1998 were Tostem Corporation (34.3% market share)..." Given that there are no secondary sources in the current article, the topic can be covered at Lixil Group for now. Mentioning a train station at the top of Lixil Group can be avoided by making this a dab page. Unscintillating ( talk) 22:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Lixil Group. Black Kite (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- Tostem ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NCORP. There is no coverage by third party reliable sources. For these reasons, I think that the article should be deleted. Please note that previously, this page was a redirect to Tostem Station, and I think that it could be re-created after deletion. Kostas20142 ( talk) 11:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lixil Group; a valid search term as per WP:ATD-R. North America 1000 02:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- A question to the nominator: when you say that there is no coverage by reliable third-party sources, I assume you checked potential sources in Japanese as well? If so, I agree with North America that "Lixil Group" is a better redirect target. If not, then someone needs to check Japanese sources before this is deleted (I do not speak Japanese, so unfortunately cannot help).— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); October 23, 2017; 14:17 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lixil Group as WP:ATD; no need for a separate article. No indications of notability or significance, and no sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- dab Lots of sources in WP:BEFORE such as sixth snippet on Google books which states, "The top five Japanese residential window companies in 1998 were Tostem Corporation (34.3% market share)..." Given that there are no secondary sources in the current article, the topic can be covered at Lixil Group for now. Mentioning a train station at the top of Lixil Group can be avoided by making this a dab page. Unscintillating ( talk) 22:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.