The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 00:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Toradex (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not notable. Still lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is press releases and a blog. Last afd found no suitable coverage and a search found nothing since then. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA ¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA ¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA ¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA ¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Wasn't notable in 2014, Isn't notable now, Won't be notable in 2016, 2017 or 2050. – Davey2010 ^Talk 23:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Still not convinced on keeping but meh sources have been added and it's been improved rather alot so meh keep .– Davey2010 ^Talk 14:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete Not sure if it qualifies for G4, but there's still no indication of notability. Plus, it really seems like WP:ADMASQ here. —  kikichugirl  ^oh hello! 04:46, 30 March 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep, The article is consistent with articles under Category:Multinational_companies_headquartered_in_Switzerland and Category:Embedded systems categories, it has undergone intensive rewrite to include more citations with more independent reliable sources. If there are problematic areas of the article trim them down but the article should stay. Sunil ( talk) 17:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep as WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 06:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC) reply

• The advertiser who wrote the first keep above claims "it has undergone intensive rewrite to include more citations with more independent reliable sources". In reality it was bombarded with more bad references, making it more promotional. My nomination stands. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep, WP:Notability The article in discussion has a pretty good reference/content ratio and there is coverage in independent sources. Jonathan 4:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
• The article was "nominated for deletion" with this reason "Still not notable. Still lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is press releases and a blog". Now the article includes citations from independent reliable sources such as EFY Times, CNXSoft News, This Week Bangalore, Gizmag, EE Herald etc. and also the article information has been published on Biggest Embedded Industry leader's websites such as ARM, Freescale, Microsoft etc. As per WP:Identifying_reliable_sources guidelines the citations are enlisted. I still vote to Keep the article on Wikipedia. Sunil ( talk) 10:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC) reply

• Sunil is lying about sources. Let's look at "citations from independent reliable sources". EFYTimes, press releases, see quote "Visit us at http://www.toradex.com and get to know more about our products & services. We believe in building long term partnerships where ever we go." [1]. CNXSoft, personal blog, see quote "I aim to share some of my knowledge though this blog and possibly learn from others as well." [2]. This Week Bangalore, press release, see the quote "Press Release" [3]. gizmag, repost of someone else's content, lacks any depth if coverage about the company. EE Herald, press release, see quote "Source: Toradex" [4]. etc? such as APN News, press release, compare it [5] with This Week Bangalore [6]. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply
• Now let's look at "Biggest Embedded Industry leader's websites". ARM? who? that goes to a disambiguation page? How about the link? Just a company listing. Freescale, just a listing, nothing independent. Microsoft, blogs.msdn.com, "Partner Spotlight", not independent. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.