The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Although the article could be greatly expanded with the information from his official CV at
[1], the material there does not indicate meeting WP:PROF or any other criterion. DGG (
talk ) 19:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, possible speedy, does not even make a claim to notability.
Hairhorn (
talk) 03:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Although the article could be greatly expanded with the information from his official CV at
[1], the material there does not indicate meeting WP:PROF or any other criterion. DGG (
talk ) 19:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, possible speedy, does not even make a claim to notability.
Hairhorn (
talk) 03:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.