The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete. --
MelanieN (
talk) 23:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Although this list is accurate and correct, it is just a synthesis of different rankings. As those rankings already have this information, this is an unnecessary article.
Natg 19 (
talk) 23:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: Awful title, looks like spam to advertise a random ranking site.--Milowent • hasspoken 03:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Plausible case for G11 speedy as unambiguously intended to promote the web site on which it relies as its single source. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Delete. --
MelanieN (
talk) 23:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Although this list is accurate and correct, it is just a synthesis of different rankings. As those rankings already have this information, this is an unnecessary article.
Natg 19 (
talk) 23:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: Awful title, looks like spam to advertise a random ranking site.--Milowent • hasspoken 03:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Plausible case for G11 speedy as unambiguously intended to promote the web site on which it relies as its single source. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.