The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not responding WP:NCORP as there are mainly press releases, gambling spammy websites references and own official non-reliable or other suspicious sources
Mambo Rumbo (
talk)
07:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)reply
[1] looks pretty good as a source. 2 or 3 more like that would be plenty IMO. The other sources in the article seem pretty weak, but I don't know the field well enough to be sure.
Hobit (
talk)
17:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hobit the site itself doesn't look notable or reliable. I mean baltictimes. it's a ghost site with 100k visits.
https://pokerindustrypro.com/ this one it terrible with 19k visits. and it's run by some freelancers from India which are spamming with paid articles in news all around.
24.138.27.215 (
talk)
14:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Could you be more specific? Are you saying
[2] is a paid-for article? It most certainly doesn't feel like it. Also
[3] is unlikely to be a paid article, though it seems to be mostly behind a paywall.
Hobit (
talk) 13:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not responding WP:NCORP as there are mainly press releases, gambling spammy websites references and own official non-reliable or other suspicious sources
Mambo Rumbo (
talk)
07:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)reply
[1] looks pretty good as a source. 2 or 3 more like that would be plenty IMO. The other sources in the article seem pretty weak, but I don't know the field well enough to be sure.
Hobit (
talk)
17:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hobit the site itself doesn't look notable or reliable. I mean baltictimes. it's a ghost site with 100k visits.
https://pokerindustrypro.com/ this one it terrible with 19k visits. and it's run by some freelancers from India which are spamming with paid articles in news all around.
24.138.27.215 (
talk)
14:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Could you be more specific? Are you saying
[2] is a paid-for article? It most certainly doesn't feel like it. Also
[3] is unlikely to be a paid article, though it seems to be mostly behind a paywall.
Hobit (
talk) 13:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.