The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is a non-notable amusement park ride. The entire text of the article was previously in
Chessington World of Adventures but has since been changed, although a merge back makes the most sense. The author is a single purpose account, and based ont he user name, has a conflict of interest. There is not external referencing for this ride to estblish notability. PROD removed without comment.
Whpq 21:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Merge back into the associated amusement park, unless additional information and references supporting the article's claims can be added. Outright delete as second option. --
saberwyn 23:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)reply
It exists; it's not especially notable; merge back. --
Simon Cursitor 08:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is a non-notable amusement park ride. The entire text of the article was previously in
Chessington World of Adventures but has since been changed, although a merge back makes the most sense. The author is a single purpose account, and based ont he user name, has a conflict of interest. There is not external referencing for this ride to estblish notability. PROD removed without comment.
Whpq 21:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Merge back into the associated amusement park, unless additional information and references supporting the article's claims can be added. Outright delete as second option. --
saberwyn 23:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)reply
It exists; it's not especially notable; merge back. --
Simon Cursitor 08:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.