The result was delete. Only reason given to keep the article is that others of the kind exist. There is a clear numerical and argumentative consensus to delete based on the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mkativerata ( talk) 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is written like an advertisement, and does not establish the notability of the subject. A web search reveals little information on him from reliable third-party sources. Taiwantaffy ( talk) 07:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Only reason given to keep the article is that others of the kind exist. There is a clear numerical and argumentative consensus to delete based on the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mkativerata ( talk) 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is written like an advertisement, and does not establish the notability of the subject. A web search reveals little information on him from reliable third-party sources. Taiwantaffy ( talk) 07:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC) reply