- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Tokyo Tower of Babel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not seem like a particularly notable idea. Only reference is clearly not an reliable source, more like a clickbait-blog page. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- There is a page about it on the Japanese Wikipedia [1] that has a source (though its author seems to be the designer of the proposed tower). Designing the tallest building ever proposed would be a notable idea, though maybe not enough for a notable article. Tiptoethrutheminefield ( talk) 20:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as no reliable, third party sources provided which establish notability. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks any in-depth coverage or third-party to demonstrate sufficient notability. -- DAJF ( talk) 13:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Tokyo Tower of Babel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not seem like a particularly notable idea. Only reference is clearly not an reliable source, more like a clickbait-blog page. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- There is a page about it on the Japanese Wikipedia [1] that has a source (though its author seems to be the designer of the proposed tower). Designing the tallest building ever proposed would be a notable idea, though maybe not enough for a notable article. Tiptoethrutheminefield ( talk) 20:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as no reliable, third party sources provided which establish notability. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks any in-depth coverage or third-party to demonstrate sufficient notability. -- DAJF ( talk) 13:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.