The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - I found
this review from IGN, but that is the only bit of significant coverage I could find, which alone is not enough to pass the
WP:GNG. I also tried searching under the Japanese text, and also found nothing much. There might be some Japanese print sources from the time it came out, but unless any are found, there is not enough coverage to support an article, and there do not appear any appropriate articles for a merge or redirect.
Rorshacma (
talk)
16:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - How is the IGN review not enough to meet the
WP:GNG? A review of a Japanese game from a major Anglophone outlet is likely a strong sign that the work in question will have received significant coverage in Japan, even if it isn't easily accessible online.
HumanBodyPiloter5 (
talk)
18:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Because the
WP:GNG calls for multiple reliable sources in order to be met. Currently, only a single reliable source has been found, which does not meet that criteria. As I stated, while there is a distinct possibility that there may be Japanese print sources available, unless those are found, we can't keep articles based on the argument that there
WP:MUSTBESOURCES.
Rorshacma (
talk)
21:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - I found
this review from IGN, but that is the only bit of significant coverage I could find, which alone is not enough to pass the
WP:GNG. I also tried searching under the Japanese text, and also found nothing much. There might be some Japanese print sources from the time it came out, but unless any are found, there is not enough coverage to support an article, and there do not appear any appropriate articles for a merge or redirect.
Rorshacma (
talk)
16:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - How is the IGN review not enough to meet the
WP:GNG? A review of a Japanese game from a major Anglophone outlet is likely a strong sign that the work in question will have received significant coverage in Japan, even if it isn't easily accessible online.
HumanBodyPiloter5 (
talk)
18:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Because the
WP:GNG calls for multiple reliable sources in order to be met. Currently, only a single reliable source has been found, which does not meet that criteria. As I stated, while there is a distinct possibility that there may be Japanese print sources available, unless those are found, we can't keep articles based on the argument that there
WP:MUSTBESOURCES.
Rorshacma (
talk)
21:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.