The result was keep because of spurious nomination, trolling; nomination by what is likely a previously blocked account — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMDrive1061 ( talk • contribs) 00:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply
This looks like some sort of a joke. As far as I can tell, the masses and masses of citations and references are a complete smokescreen. Most of the article doesn't discuss toilet paper orientation at all but tangentially related topics. Xjobcon ( talk) 19:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep because of spurious nomination, trolling; nomination by what is likely a previously blocked account — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMDrive1061 ( talk • contribs) 00:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply
This looks like some sort of a joke. As far as I can tell, the masses and masses of citations and references are a complete smokescreen. Most of the article doesn't discuss toilet paper orientation at all but tangentially related topics. Xjobcon ( talk) 19:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC) reply