The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There's no indication that the films, or his roles in them, are notable, & I do not consider that participation in one reality show implies automatic notability; there's nothing else substantial. Iam aware of the previous keep, and I think it mistaken--the sources were assumed to show notability , but they're the customary sort of promotional interviews and other puffery. DGG (
talk )
19:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep — In the very least just like my senior colleague
Versace1608 already said I do believe subject of the article does satisfy
WP:BASIC. In the previous AFD I !voted a keep so yeah I’m still inclined to uphold that if anything he has really advanced his career even more since then.
Celestina007 (
talk)
21:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: I understand where the nominator is coming from, because, in terms of
WP:NACTOR, it could be said that the article was created a little prematurely. But, that aside, there is an abundance of coverage on the subject in reliable sources (even if some of the articles appear a little frivolous in nature). There's enough to pass both
WP:GNG and NACTOR, in my opinion.
Dflaw4 (
talk)
05:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There's no indication that the films, or his roles in them, are notable, & I do not consider that participation in one reality show implies automatic notability; there's nothing else substantial. Iam aware of the previous keep, and I think it mistaken--the sources were assumed to show notability , but they're the customary sort of promotional interviews and other puffery. DGG (
talk )
19:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep — In the very least just like my senior colleague
Versace1608 already said I do believe subject of the article does satisfy
WP:BASIC. In the previous AFD I !voted a keep so yeah I’m still inclined to uphold that if anything he has really advanced his career even more since then.
Celestina007 (
talk)
21:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: I understand where the nominator is coming from, because, in terms of
WP:NACTOR, it could be said that the article was created a little prematurely. But, that aside, there is an abundance of coverage on the subject in reliable sources (even if some of the articles appear a little frivolous in nature). There's enough to pass both
WP:GNG and NACTOR, in my opinion.
Dflaw4 (
talk)
05:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.