The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
While I am generally in favour of inclusion, I don't see any evidence that this book is any more notable than 1000 other Star Trek novels. -mattbuck (
Talk) 10:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Northamerica1000(talk) 15:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: I'd like to think it's possible to find reliable sources that have discussed the book, but I'm not in a position to look myself.
DonIago (
talk) 18:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak keep or Merge: I do believe that Greg Cox's first two volumes of this trilogy are notable enough for inclusion. However, it is possible that this book isn't notable enough for its own article. In that case I think the information in this article should be merged with
The Eugenics Wars: The Rise and Fall of Khan Noonien Singh. This novel could have a subsection and this page could be redirected to that.
Johnred32 (
talk) 19:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 01:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
While I am generally in favour of inclusion, I don't see any evidence that this book is any more notable than 1000 other Star Trek novels. -mattbuck (
Talk) 10:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Northamerica1000(talk) 15:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: I'd like to think it's possible to find reliable sources that have discussed the book, but I'm not in a position to look myself.
DonIago (
talk) 18:14, 18 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak keep or Merge: I do believe that Greg Cox's first two volumes of this trilogy are notable enough for inclusion. However, it is possible that this book isn't notable enough for its own article. In that case I think the information in this article should be merged with
The Eugenics Wars: The Rise and Fall of Khan Noonien Singh. This novel could have a subsection and this page could be redirected to that.
Johnred32 (
talk) 19:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 01:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.