- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Titoni ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no notablity and promotional Puccetto ( talk) 15:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 15:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 7. — cyberbot I NotifyOnline 16:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I made a mistake: article is Titoni-- Puccetto ( talk) 16:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced ( WP:V) and therefore also presumed not to be notable ( WP:N) until proven otherwise. Also blatantly promotional in tone, possibly a G11 case. Sandstein 15:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 17:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 13:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing of substance in my searches via Google/GBooks. Also blatantly promotional as pointed above. Cavarrone 13:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Titoni ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no notablity and promotional Puccetto ( talk) 15:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 15:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 7. — cyberbot I NotifyOnline 16:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I made a mistake: article is Titoni-- Puccetto ( talk) 16:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced ( WP:V) and therefore also presumed not to be notable ( WP:N) until proven otherwise. Also blatantly promotional in tone, possibly a G11 case. Sandstein 15:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 17:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 13:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing of substance in my searches via Google/GBooks. Also blatantly promotional as pointed above. Cavarrone 13:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.