The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: JTZegers, you misunderstood
WP:TOOSHORT; that guideline says that the length of the article is not a reason to delete a page. What matters is the quality of the sources, and the Vineyard Gazette coverage establishes notability. For example,
this article goes into some detail on the chemical makeup of the pond. —
Toughpigs (
talk)
23:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Citations provided plus others available in news and book sources satisfy the
WP:notability requires verifiable evidence test. Also WP:TOOSHORT is a section from the larger
WP:overzealous deletion essay. Significance is proven by availability of reliable sources, not by content incorporated into the article. That said, the stub can use a greater diversity of sources, but that appears to be a surmountable problem.
• Gene93k (
talk)
19:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: JTZegers, you misunderstood
WP:TOOSHORT; that guideline says that the length of the article is not a reason to delete a page. What matters is the quality of the sources, and the Vineyard Gazette coverage establishes notability. For example,
this article goes into some detail on the chemical makeup of the pond. —
Toughpigs (
talk)
23:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Citations provided plus others available in news and book sources satisfy the
WP:notability requires verifiable evidence test. Also WP:TOOSHORT is a section from the larger
WP:overzealous deletion essay. Significance is proven by availability of reliable sources, not by content incorporated into the article. That said, the stub can use a greater diversity of sources, but that appears to be a surmountable problem.
• Gene93k (
talk)
19:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.