- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 05:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Tipica
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tipica ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Journal that fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. 1900-5121, its ISSN, does not turn up any results at MIAR (a directory of journal indexes) although it does appear to have been legitimately assigned. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 16:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 05:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Tipica
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tipica ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Journal that fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. 1900-5121, its ISSN, does not turn up any results at MIAR (a directory of journal indexes) although it does appear to have been legitimately assigned. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 16:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.