![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 July 3. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Discussion below indicates that the article violates WP:SYN and WP:NPOV. -- jonny- m t 14:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a textbook example of an indiscriminate collection of information. It isn't that it is crystal balling, because we can document predictions, it is that placing a number of calender events, with sporting plans, and environmental predictions constitutes an original synthesis. None of this is sourced, but even if sourced, why should we use one scientists prediction of the effects of global warming over another's (that's POV). Basically this is going nowhere encyclopedic. Docg 21:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 July 3. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Discussion below indicates that the article violates WP:SYN and WP:NPOV. -- jonny- m t 14:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a textbook example of an indiscriminate collection of information. It isn't that it is crystal balling, because we can document predictions, it is that placing a number of calender events, with sporting plans, and environmental predictions constitutes an original synthesis. None of this is sourced, but even if sourced, why should we use one scientists prediction of the effects of global warming over another's (that's POV). Basically this is going nowhere encyclopedic. Docg 21:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC) reply