- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD A11 Liz Read! Talk! 08:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tick oaT Two ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, fails WP:GNG, created by non-notable YouTuber. Only coverage I can find online is three YouTube videos and a Reddit post, all created in the last few days. Tic-tac-toe has just had semi-protection extended over repeated unsourced additions about this, and it looks like Tic-tac-toe variants will be next. Doesn't seem to qualify for WP:A11, but it certainly is a recently made-up and non-notable game. Proposed deletion contested without comment, by one of the new accounts pushing this. Duplicate also created at TickOatTwo. Speedy deleted three times in the last few times at Dutch WP, at nl:Tick oat two. Storchy ( talk) 08:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Storchy ( talk) 08:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete lack of demonstrated notability. -- WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/ loopback 09:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per 127, literally just made up by some random Youtuber. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete zero sourcing other than self-made posts. Delete. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete
WP:CSD#A11. Despite nomination, I think this does qualify, because the article says it is made up by some YouTuber. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
16:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- I suspect it's for self-promotion? That or a bad ARG. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete has a lack of notability and also made up by some random youtuber. Evaxooooof25 ( talk) 02:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Has WP:MADEUP all over it. DarkAudit ( talk) 04:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Made up by a random Youtuber, no indication of notability and probably no credible claims of significance. I've submitted an A11 request, however it might be declined. VickKiang (talk) 07:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD A11 Liz Read! Talk! 08:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tick oaT Two ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, fails WP:GNG, created by non-notable YouTuber. Only coverage I can find online is three YouTube videos and a Reddit post, all created in the last few days. Tic-tac-toe has just had semi-protection extended over repeated unsourced additions about this, and it looks like Tic-tac-toe variants will be next. Doesn't seem to qualify for WP:A11, but it certainly is a recently made-up and non-notable game. Proposed deletion contested without comment, by one of the new accounts pushing this. Duplicate also created at TickOatTwo. Speedy deleted three times in the last few times at Dutch WP, at nl:Tick oat two. Storchy ( talk) 08:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Storchy ( talk) 08:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete lack of demonstrated notability. -- WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/ loopback 09:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per 127, literally just made up by some random Youtuber. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete zero sourcing other than self-made posts. Delete. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete
WP:CSD#A11. Despite nomination, I think this does qualify, because the article says it is made up by some YouTuber. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
16:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- I suspect it's for self-promotion? That or a bad ARG. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete has a lack of notability and also made up by some random youtuber. Evaxooooof25 ( talk) 02:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Has WP:MADEUP all over it. DarkAudit ( talk) 04:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Made up by a random Youtuber, no indication of notability and probably no credible claims of significance. I've submitted an A11 request, however it might be declined. VickKiang (talk) 07:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.