- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Thomas Lloyd (actor)
- Thomas Lloyd (actor) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A directory-like listing with no encyclopedically relevant prose. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. Significant RS coverage not found. Award listed is not significant. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong delete total failure of the relevant notability guidelines. It is junk articles like this that give Wikipedia a bad name. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Personally I think this is more or less A7 material, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 22:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete does not appear to meet WP:GNG based on sources provided nor any other notability guideline I can think of.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 22:02, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Thomas Lloyd (actor)
- Thomas Lloyd (actor) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A directory-like listing with no encyclopedically relevant prose. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. Significant RS coverage not found. Award listed is not significant. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong delete total failure of the relevant notability guidelines. It is junk articles like this that give Wikipedia a bad name. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Personally I think this is more or less A7 material, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 22:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete does not appear to meet WP:GNG based on sources provided nor any other notability guideline I can think of.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 22:02, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.