- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Third battle of Anandpur (1704)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Third battle of Anandpur (1704) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources were used. User has a history of making poorly sourced articles, sometimes with copyright violations, that aggrandize the Sikh side in armed conflicts. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 20:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Analysing references from a version before cleanup, the first source is a no-byline compilation from the religious portal allaboutsikhs.com, the second source is self-published and the third source from a self-published novel-author is "historical fiction". Unless WP:HISTRS sources are provided to determine notability WP:NEVENT, fiction has no place here. — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c) 10:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Sources before cleanup were all unreliable. This is one of those many articles where the editor has no WP:COMPETENCE that could result in any benefaction. This article has no significant notability with no coverage from scholarly sources. RangersRus ( talk) 13:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Third battle of Anandpur (1704)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Third battle of Anandpur (1704) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources were used. User has a history of making poorly sourced articles, sometimes with copyright violations, that aggrandize the Sikh side in armed conflicts. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 20:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Analysing references from a version before cleanup, the first source is a no-byline compilation from the religious portal allaboutsikhs.com, the second source is self-published and the third source from a self-published novel-author is "historical fiction". Unless WP:HISTRS sources are provided to determine notability WP:NEVENT, fiction has no place here. — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c) 10:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Sources before cleanup were all unreliable. This is one of those many articles where the editor has no WP:COMPETENCE that could result in any benefaction. This article has no significant notability with no coverage from scholarly sources. RangersRus ( talk) 13:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.