The result was Speedy delete per criterion G1: patent nonsense. RockMagnetist ( talk) 19:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2013 April 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
I don't know a lot of physics, but I do know that an article about a theory that has no book hits whatsoever, and is sourced to a single document, is probably original research and does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. No prejudice to withdrawing this AFD if someone can provide evidence to the contrary. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete per criterion G1: patent nonsense. RockMagnetist ( talk) 19:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2013 April 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
I don't know a lot of physics, but I do know that an article about a theory that has no book hits whatsoever, and is sourced to a single document, is probably original research and does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. No prejudice to withdrawing this AFD if someone can provide evidence to the contrary. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply