The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article was redirected after a contested Prod, which I have reverted. Bringing it up here as a better venue to consider deletion.
Artw (
talk)
16:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: the article has multiple independent, reliable and secondary sources with significant coverage. The sources are also published over the period of a year, so
WP:NOTNEWS does not apply here. It meets the requirements from the
WP:GNG. It is currently a stub article, but can be extended quite a bit from the sources that are currently used. Since the subject has stated he is fine with the publicity in The Guardian article, there should be no problems with
WP:BLP to have an article about the subject.
PhotographyEdits (
talk)
16:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment another argument for keeping this article would be the inclusion of the picture: since it is non-free, the entire article has to be about the subject.
PhotographyEdits (
talk)
17:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article was redirected after a contested Prod, which I have reverted. Bringing it up here as a better venue to consider deletion.
Artw (
talk)
16:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: the article has multiple independent, reliable and secondary sources with significant coverage. The sources are also published over the period of a year, so
WP:NOTNEWS does not apply here. It meets the requirements from the
WP:GNG. It is currently a stub article, but can be extended quite a bit from the sources that are currently used. Since the subject has stated he is fine with the publicity in The Guardian article, there should be no problems with
WP:BLP to have an article about the subject.
PhotographyEdits (
talk)
16:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment another argument for keeping this article would be the inclusion of the picture: since it is non-free, the entire article has to be about the subject.
PhotographyEdits (
talk)
17:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.