The result was keep. JForget 01:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Another editor's prod was contested, so here we are.
Enid Blyton is certainly notable, and if someone wants to write articles about every one of her hundreds of books, a good argument could be made for keeping them all. These, however, are not exactly Enid Blyton books. This is a recent
"series" confected by taking old Blyton non-series works—Holiday House (1955), The Boy Next Door (1944), Hollow Tree House (1945), etc. (see
Enid Blyton bibliography)—which originally had no characters in common, and "editing" (i.e., extensively rewriting) them to feature a common set of characters protagonists. I can find no evidence of any treatment of this project in
reliable, independent sources that would allow the topic to satisfy the requirements of
WP:BK.
Deor (
talk) 02:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. JForget 01:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Another editor's prod was contested, so here we are.
Enid Blyton is certainly notable, and if someone wants to write articles about every one of her hundreds of books, a good argument could be made for keeping them all. These, however, are not exactly Enid Blyton books. This is a recent
"series" confected by taking old Blyton non-series works—Holiday House (1955), The Boy Next Door (1944), Hollow Tree House (1945), etc. (see
Enid Blyton bibliography)—which originally had no characters in common, and "editing" (i.e., extensively rewriting) them to feature a common set of characters protagonists. I can find no evidence of any treatment of this project in
reliable, independent sources that would allow the topic to satisfy the requirements of
WP:BK.
Deor (
talk) 02:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
reply