The result was no consensus, for an article which is a member of a category of articles (student newspapers at accredited universities) about which we have no consensus, as Travellingcari points out. There are some sources so whether or not this passes WP:N remains debatable. The fact is we do not have a notability guideline for periodicals and newspapers (student or otherwise), and until we do many AfD's on publications like The Varsitarian will end up at no consensus given the large gray area in our general notability guideline.-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 09:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable student/school newspaper, no indepedent RS for notability...just another student paper. Cquan ( after the beep...) 08:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The nomination is a perfect example of systemic bias and sheer irresponsibility. Starczamora ( talk) 04:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, for an article which is a member of a category of articles (student newspapers at accredited universities) about which we have no consensus, as Travellingcari points out. There are some sources so whether or not this passes WP:N remains debatable. The fact is we do not have a notability guideline for periodicals and newspapers (student or otherwise), and until we do many AfD's on publications like The Varsitarian will end up at no consensus given the large gray area in our general notability guideline.-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 09:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable student/school newspaper, no indepedent RS for notability...just another student paper. Cquan ( after the beep...) 08:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The nomination is a perfect example of systemic bias and sheer irresponsibility. Starczamora ( talk) 04:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply