The result was speedy delete.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable online newspaper fails to demonstrate the notability per WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG. Primary, unreliable and irrelevant sources. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 12:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Vach | This is the website's homepage. | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
[voyagela.com/interview/inspiring-conversations-with-justin-jin-of-50mmidas/ Voyage LA Magazine | This is an interview with Justin Jin, who founded The Vach, and it was published in a PR publication. | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF. | Clear independence issues aside, The Vach is mentioned only in passing. | ✘ No |
"About us" from The Vach | This is The Vach's about us page | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
Social Blade | Why not | Social Blade seems fine | This is a database entry. | ✘ No |
IMDB | IMDB pro account; not independent of Jin. | WP:IMDB | The Vach is mentioned only in passing. | ✘ No |
"We faked YouTube's oldest video" from The Vach | This is an article published on The Vach | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
Motherboard/Vice on TikTok | Motherboard and Vice are independent of this (I think). | ~ Vice is WP:MREL on WP:RSP, and this is a TikTok. | The Vach is not so much as mentioned by name once. | ✘ No |
The Independent | U.K. Quality Press WP:NEWSORG | U.K. Quality Press WP:NEWSORG | The Vach is not so much as mentioned once in the entire article. | ✘ No |
The Verge | Why not? | Why not? | The Vach is not so much as mentioned once in the entire article. | ✘ No |
The Times of India | Why not? | ~ See WP:TOI. | The Vach is not so much as mentioned once in the entire article. | ✘ No |
The Vach on YouTube | This is the YouTube channel for The Vach | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
Buzzfeed ( archive link) | ? The author is a Buzzfeed community contributor, so that could be anyone including an author with a COI. | Buzzfeed community contributors are self-published blogposts. | ? Moot as clearly unreliable. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was speedy delete.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable online newspaper fails to demonstrate the notability per WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG. Primary, unreliable and irrelevant sources. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 12:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Vach | This is the website's homepage. | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
[voyagela.com/interview/inspiring-conversations-with-justin-jin-of-50mmidas/ Voyage LA Magazine | This is an interview with Justin Jin, who founded The Vach, and it was published in a PR publication. | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF. | Clear independence issues aside, The Vach is mentioned only in passing. | ✘ No |
"About us" from The Vach | This is The Vach's about us page | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
Social Blade | Why not | Social Blade seems fine | This is a database entry. | ✘ No |
IMDB | IMDB pro account; not independent of Jin. | WP:IMDB | The Vach is mentioned only in passing. | ✘ No |
"We faked YouTube's oldest video" from The Vach | This is an article published on The Vach | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
Motherboard/Vice on TikTok | Motherboard and Vice are independent of this (I think). | ~ Vice is WP:MREL on WP:RSP, and this is a TikTok. | The Vach is not so much as mentioned by name once. | ✘ No |
The Independent | U.K. Quality Press WP:NEWSORG | U.K. Quality Press WP:NEWSORG | The Vach is not so much as mentioned once in the entire article. | ✘ No |
The Verge | Why not? | Why not? | The Vach is not so much as mentioned once in the entire article. | ✘ No |
The Times of India | Why not? | ~ See WP:TOI. | The Vach is not so much as mentioned once in the entire article. | ✘ No |
The Vach on YouTube | This is the YouTube channel for The Vach | ~ WP:ABOUTSELF | ? Moot as clearly non-independent. | ✘ No |
Buzzfeed ( archive link) | ? The author is a Buzzfeed community contributor, so that could be anyone including an author with a COI. | Buzzfeed community contributors are self-published blogposts. | ? Moot as clearly unreliable. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |