- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA 1000 02:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
The Union Advertising Agency
- The Union Advertising Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. None of these "references" (most of which should be wikilinks) mention the subject of the article. ubiquity ( talk) 16:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The nominator is right, most of the "references" are to completely unrelated Wikipedia articles. BenLinus 1214 talk 23:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 13:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 13:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -Yes, it definitely is not-eligible for inclusion at this time. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 01:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. Also note WP:42. Bearian ( talk) 20:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA 1000 02:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
The Union Advertising Agency
- The Union Advertising Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. None of these "references" (most of which should be wikilinks) mention the subject of the article. ubiquity ( talk) 16:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The nominator is right, most of the "references" are to completely unrelated Wikipedia articles. BenLinus 1214 talk 23:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 13:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 13:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -Yes, it definitely is not-eligible for inclusion at this time. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 01:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. Also note WP:42. Bearian ( talk) 20:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.