The result was No consensus, defaults to Keep. Any help untagging the 96 articles would be appreciated. NawlinWiki 04:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC) reply
OK... this AfD covers the following 96 articles:
United States Network Television Schedule |
1946-47 •
1947-48 •
1948-49 •
1949-50 1950-51 • 1951-52 • 1952-53 • 1953-54 • 1954-55 • 1955-56 • 1956-57 • 1957-58 • 1958-59 • 1959-60 1960-61 • 1961-62 • 1962-63 • 1963-64 • 1964-65 • 1965-66 • 1966-67 • 1967-68 • 1968-69 • 1969-70 1970-71 • 1971-72 • 1972-73 • 1973-74 • 1974-75 • 1975-76 • 1976-77 • 1977-78 • 1978-79 • 1979-80 1980-81 • 1981-82 • 1982-83 • 1983-84 • 1984-85 • 1985-86 • 1986-87 • 1987-88 • 1988-89 • 1989-90 1990-91 • 1991-92 • 1992-93 • 1993-94 • 1994-95 • 1995-96 • 1996-97 • 1997-98 • 1998-99 • 1999-00 2000-01 • 2001-02 • 2002-03 • 2003-04 • 2004-05 • 2005-06 • 2006-07 • 2007-08 |
... and ...
Seasons: 1990-91 - 1991-92 - 1992-93 - 1993-94 - 1994-95 - 1995-96 - 1996-97 - 1997-98 - 1998-99 - 1999-00 |
Seasons: 1980-81 - 1981-82 - 1982-83 - 1983-84 - 1984-85 - 1985-86 - 1986-87 - 1987-88 - 1988-89 - 1989-90 |
Seasons: 1970-71 - 1971-72 - 1972-73 - 1973-74 - 1974-75 - 1975-76 - 1976-77 - 1977-78 - 1978-79 - 1979-80 |
Seasons: 1966-67 - 1967-68 - 1968-69 - 1969-70 |
( View log)
With every single one of these articles, there is little more than what the titles say, i.e. the network television schedule for the years listed. I'm quite wogboggled that these have existed this long... Wikipedia Is Not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor are we a historical TV Guide. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and these listings serve no encyclopedic purpose. Folks have put a fair amount of work into these, so a transwiki would be best (Wikisource?)... but at the very least they need to be removed from here because this content (which is largely unsourced) is just not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Delete ALL. -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
or [4] or [5] or any of the plenty of others you can find. If your problem is that these articles don't offer enough content besides the raw schedules, I'd respect the desire to expand them. That seems a reasonable request. However, objecting to the inclusion of the schedules themselves? Doesn't make sense, as that provides the very framework which the further content would exist around. FrozenPurpleCube 01:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus, defaults to Keep. Any help untagging the 96 articles would be appreciated. NawlinWiki 04:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC) reply
OK... this AfD covers the following 96 articles:
United States Network Television Schedule |
1946-47 •
1947-48 •
1948-49 •
1949-50 1950-51 • 1951-52 • 1952-53 • 1953-54 • 1954-55 • 1955-56 • 1956-57 • 1957-58 • 1958-59 • 1959-60 1960-61 • 1961-62 • 1962-63 • 1963-64 • 1964-65 • 1965-66 • 1966-67 • 1967-68 • 1968-69 • 1969-70 1970-71 • 1971-72 • 1972-73 • 1973-74 • 1974-75 • 1975-76 • 1976-77 • 1977-78 • 1978-79 • 1979-80 1980-81 • 1981-82 • 1982-83 • 1983-84 • 1984-85 • 1985-86 • 1986-87 • 1987-88 • 1988-89 • 1989-90 1990-91 • 1991-92 • 1992-93 • 1993-94 • 1994-95 • 1995-96 • 1996-97 • 1997-98 • 1998-99 • 1999-00 2000-01 • 2001-02 • 2002-03 • 2003-04 • 2004-05 • 2005-06 • 2006-07 • 2007-08 |
... and ...
Seasons: 1990-91 - 1991-92 - 1992-93 - 1993-94 - 1994-95 - 1995-96 - 1996-97 - 1997-98 - 1998-99 - 1999-00 |
Seasons: 1980-81 - 1981-82 - 1982-83 - 1983-84 - 1984-85 - 1985-86 - 1986-87 - 1987-88 - 1988-89 - 1989-90 |
Seasons: 1970-71 - 1971-72 - 1972-73 - 1973-74 - 1974-75 - 1975-76 - 1976-77 - 1977-78 - 1978-79 - 1979-80 |
Seasons: 1966-67 - 1967-68 - 1968-69 - 1969-70 |
( View log)
With every single one of these articles, there is little more than what the titles say, i.e. the network television schedule for the years listed. I'm quite wogboggled that these have existed this long... Wikipedia Is Not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor are we a historical TV Guide. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and these listings serve no encyclopedic purpose. Folks have put a fair amount of work into these, so a transwiki would be best (Wikisource?)... but at the very least they need to be removed from here because this content (which is largely unsourced) is just not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Delete ALL. -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
or [4] or [5] or any of the plenty of others you can find. If your problem is that these articles don't offer enough content besides the raw schedules, I'd respect the desire to expand them. That seems a reasonable request. However, objecting to the inclusion of the schedules themselves? Doesn't make sense, as that provides the very framework which the further content would exist around. FrozenPurpleCube 01:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply