The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:MUSIC, bootlegs are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.
SummerPhD (
talk) 00:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this
bootleg.
Joe Chill (
talk) 01:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable bootleg. Skip redirecting as an unlikely search term.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 16:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:MUSIC, bootlegs are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.
SummerPhD (
talk) 00:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this
bootleg.
Joe Chill (
talk) 01:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable bootleg. Skip redirecting as an unlikely search term.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 16:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.