The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Blatant hoax.
NW(
Talk) 21:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Looks like a hoax to me. Unsourced, created by an editor with a history of dubious additions and changes. —
Kww(
talk) 20:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Blatant hoax.
NW(
Talk) 21:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Looks like a hoax to me. Unsourced, created by an editor with a history of dubious additions and changes. —
Kww(
talk) 20:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.