- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Recurring Saturday Night Live characters and sketches introduced 1995–1996. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- The Spartan Cheerleaders ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost completely original research, isn't notable enough for a stand-alone article. StewdioMACK Talk page 06:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Recurring Saturday Night Live characters and sketches introduced 1995–1996. Appears to be a significant recurring skit ( [1]), but a mass of unsourced crufty detail doesn't justify a standalone article. -- Michig ( talk) 08:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 13:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 13:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Given a lack of reliable sources independent of the subject, I'd agree with redirect as suggested by Michig -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Recurring Saturday Night Live characters and sketches introduced 1995–1996. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- The Spartan Cheerleaders ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost completely original research, isn't notable enough for a stand-alone article. StewdioMACK Talk page 06:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Recurring Saturday Night Live characters and sketches introduced 1995–1996. Appears to be a significant recurring skit ( [1]), but a mass of unsourced crufty detail doesn't justify a standalone article. -- Michig ( talk) 08:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 17:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 13:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 13:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Given a lack of reliable sources independent of the subject, I'd agree with redirect as suggested by Michig -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.