The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article fails
WP:NPOV--it is an attempt to correlate parts of the
Qur'ān with the current paradigm of scientific thought. Fails
WP:OR as well. It is interesting, certainly, but it does not belong in an encyclopedia. If it can be salvaged, I'm all for it--however, I think the idea of selectively correlating parts of a text (while ignoring those bits that don't correspond well) cannot adhere to NPOV. --
Merope
Talk
21:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
I have changed my mind regarding the article. I believe that, should it implement
reliable sources and address both aspects of the issue (as
Science and the Bible does), it will be an excellent and interesting contribution to the project. It will have to be developed beyond the collection of quotes it currently hosts, but I no longer believe it is a candidate for deletion. Keep. --
Merope
Talk
14:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Can you please delete it. I will try to work on it at my user space and will post it back after making it much mature. I will try to give both sides view and everything will have reference. At the moment they have started an edit war and adding their own comments. For example -- Ant cannot speak "ARABIC" (just 100% their own comments - like talk page). I already have much less time to work on the article and cannot afford it at the moment. Can some guide me that how can this article be deleted? Danke schoen!--- ابراهيم 08:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep As it stands, this article needs a lot of work, however, in principle, I can't find a reason to object to it other than it will be difficult to do properly. However, it is not necessarily impossible to do so, and I'd prefer to wait at least a month, see if it gets anywhere close to the Bible article. FrozenPurpleCube 02:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article fails
WP:NPOV--it is an attempt to correlate parts of the
Qur'ān with the current paradigm of scientific thought. Fails
WP:OR as well. It is interesting, certainly, but it does not belong in an encyclopedia. If it can be salvaged, I'm all for it--however, I think the idea of selectively correlating parts of a text (while ignoring those bits that don't correspond well) cannot adhere to NPOV. --
Merope
Talk
21:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
I have changed my mind regarding the article. I believe that, should it implement
reliable sources and address both aspects of the issue (as
Science and the Bible does), it will be an excellent and interesting contribution to the project. It will have to be developed beyond the collection of quotes it currently hosts, but I no longer believe it is a candidate for deletion. Keep. --
Merope
Talk
14:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Can you please delete it. I will try to work on it at my user space and will post it back after making it much mature. I will try to give both sides view and everything will have reference. At the moment they have started an edit war and adding their own comments. For example -- Ant cannot speak "ARABIC" (just 100% their own comments - like talk page). I already have much less time to work on the article and cannot afford it at the moment. Can some guide me that how can this article be deleted? Danke schoen!--- ابراهيم 08:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep As it stands, this article needs a lot of work, however, in principle, I can't find a reason to object to it other than it will be difficult to do properly. However, it is not necessarily impossible to do so, and I'd prefer to wait at least a month, see if it gets anywhere close to the Bible article. FrozenPurpleCube 02:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC) reply