The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Hammer, if you want to knock this around some more let me know and I'll be happy to reopen it. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Last two AFDs argued that sourcing was sufficient, but further inspection shows the sources to be incidental, trivial coverage or press releases, which do not meet the criteria for third-party coverage. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 06:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Hammer, if you want to knock this around some more let me know and I'll be happy to reopen it. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Last two AFDs argued that sourcing was sufficient, but further inspection shows the sources to be incidental, trivial coverage or press releases, which do not meet the criteria for third-party coverage. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 06:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply